Puff and Prejudice

The Sushant Singh Rajput case has slid from being just a murder investigation to a drug bust. One wonders if this investigation has ended up exposing middle-class India’s prejudice, hypocrisy and Victorian prudishness?

To begin with Rhea Chakraborty, Sushant’s girlfriend, has been portrayed like a typical movie ‘Vampy-Villainess,’ the woman who drugged her lover to steal his money. Meanwhile her boyfriend, a grown man, who did not use his own phone to order drugs for his personal use so as to protect his reputation, has been portrayed as an innocent victim caught in the web spun by this ‘black-widow.’ That’s prejudice.

We so easily blame women for the ills of men? A few years ago as I stood at the funeral of a middle-aged man in Saraswathipuram, I overheard his wife being blamed for not cooking tasty enough food, which supposedly forced her husband to eat out, leading him to have high BP and sugar! They said, “She killed him”! What they didn’t stop to consider is that the husband wanted mutton chops and 100 Pipers whiskey everyday and rejected the healthy food his wife cooked at home.

Then we have Kangana Ranaut, who was addressed in a derogatory manner by a politician and we, the middle class Indians, rightfully got upset and supported her. But then, when Kangana started calling other women “soft porn star”, “sasti actress” or “mafia bimbo,” we forgive her and say she’s just a fierce feminist? So when a man is disrespectful towards a woman, it is wrong; but when a woman is, it is not?

We have become a prejudiced lot who love it when bad things happen to people we envy. There is a word for it in German, Schadenfreude, pronounced, ‘shaa•duhn•froy•duh.’ This word is used to express the experience of pleasure or joy that comes from learning of, or witnessing the troubles, failures or humiliation of another. In short, one could call it “malicious joy.” What is happening in Mumbai is the manifestation of collective Schadenfredue among the Indian middle class towards the rich and beautiful whom we envy and are jealous of. It stopped being “all about” justice for Sushant long time ago.

Now as for drugs, the young actors have been summoned. Suddenly our Victorian prudishness is telling us that these girls are “bad girls”; they are “loose girls” and so they deserve what they’re getting. But why? Because these girls have had multiple boy friends, they wear skimpy clothes, they do item numbers, they speak their mind, they are aggressive and so it is no surprise they also do “drugs. They deserve to suffer. So it’s a moralistic judgement, not factual.

The problem is even some of our law-makers and law-keepers think in moralistic terms instead of factual terms. They go by their prejudice, not evidence. By the way these girls seem to have consumed what many holy men consume at one of the largest holy gatherings in the world.

We wish the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) has the same enthusiasm to go after the big fish. These actors are just tiny guppy fish in a small self-loathing narcissistic aquarium called Bollywood and Sandalwood. By the way, it is said criminalising of cannabis happened in 1985, when the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law was legislated. Here is the interesting bit — It is said that this law got a push because Congressman Sunil Dutt was traumatised by his son Sanjay Dutt’s addiction. Ah! like a movie script, a Bollywood-induced law has come to bite Bollywood!

But we must also remember that during the 1961 Convention on Narcotic Drugs, the US wanted cannabis declared a “hard drug” but India did not agree but buckled in 1985. We went along with them back then because we needed them. Now that they have made cannabis legal, why must we be left stuck with a law they forced upon us? Also if bhaang is legal, why not cannabis? The effects are pretty much the same.